Stopping Corruption Happening from WithIn The Courtroom

First off, federal statutes are not to be played with; The United States Judicial System is an important & unique tool *by & for The People* that was hard-fought among a nation that has for too many centuries been caught in war; we are founded upon a desperate fight for freedom following thousands of years of oppression!  Respect the legal system- & if you don’t like something about it- change it!  It is built by us so let’s make it good for coming generations.  Our work is not yet finished.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 24 Intervention of Right

Intervention of Right for wbsite

One example of a “federal statute” that could “give an unconditional right” for “anyone” to “intervene”– which the court “must permit”– would be:

Action for Neglect to Prevent full

   Here is “Section 1985” mentioned in the above statute:

Conspiracy to Interfere w Civil Rights full

   When corruption is being witnessed in court, for instance, (rights being denied to Defendant) one way that the above three codes can “work together” is by interjecting from the audience if need be (First Amendment, inalienable& saying something such as, “Intervention of Right, Your Honour,” OR by writing a letter  (“motion”) to the Court, & referencing “Intervention of RIght“, & saying something such as

“Your honor, I could have been charged with “Action for Neglect to Prevent” had I NOT performed a “Intervention of Right” BECAUSE I am clearly witnessing United States Code “Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights” taking place now.”

Clarification:  “Action for Neglect to Prevent” forced the “Intervention of Right“, making it unstoppable (“Intervention of Right” reads “the court must permit”).

   IMPORTANT!

If the Judge or Magistrate does not permit the Intervention of Right, they may then be charged with 2 counts of Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law— one count for depriving your “Intervention of Right” & one count for depriving The Defendant of their Due Process (5th Amendment)— which would also force the case to be thrown out.  The Judge or Magistrate could also be charged with Contempt of Court for “not following proper procedure”.  To file such charges, File an Affidavit Citizen’s Arrest.

quote-there-is-nothing-so-annoying-as-to-have-two-people-talking-when-you-re-busy-interrupting-mark-twain-334696

Thank you IzQuotes.com for this cutely-relevant Mark Twain quote!

Questions?  Comments?  Insight?  Additional research?  Distance@WildWillpower.org

Source LYNX graphic

“Federal Statutes” on the Library of Congress website:  http://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes.php
“Intervention of Right” on the Legal Information Institute of Cornell University Law School:  http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_24
“Action for Neglect to Prevent” from the website of the U.S. Government Printing Office:  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2010-title42/USCODE-2010-title42-chap21-subchapI-sec1986
Definition of “CONSPIRACY” on Black’s Law dictionary:  http://thelawdictionary.org/conspiracy/
“Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights” from the website of the U.S. Government Printing Office:  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2010-title42/USCODE-2010-title42-chap21-subchapI-sec1985
Mark Twain quote on “interrupting”:  http://izquotes.com/quote/334696

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

How the U.S. Judicial System is Designed to Enable The People to Fix the System when used as Designed